Legal Opinion
Reinsch v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1966No. Civ. 28527PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment in an action for an injunction and for declaratory relief with respect to the use by the city and other defendants of a drainpipe which passes through the plaintiffs’ residential property. The judgment does not embody a declaration of the rights of the parties but merely provides that the plaintiffs take nothing by their complaint and that the defendants recover their costs.
The nature of the controversy is disclosed by the findings of fact, which are in part as follows: 1. In 1953 the plaintiffs purchased Lots 1 and 2 of Tract No. 14313 in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hesperia Land & Water Co. v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Brown v. World ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Drennen v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Hamilton Jewelers v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sutter v. MadrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.