Legal Opinion
Anders v. Powertrain Division, General Motors Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 2004No. Nos. 4-03-16, 4-03-17, 4-03-18, 4-03-19, 4-03-20, 4-03-21, 4-03-22, 4-03-23, 4-03-24, 4-03-25, 4-03-26, 4-03-27, 4-03-28, 4-03-29, 4-03-30, 4-03-31, 4-03-32, 4-03-33, 4-03-34, 4-03-35, 4-03-36, 4-03-37, 4-03-38, 4-03-39, 4-03-40, 4-03-41, 4-03-42, 4-03-43, 4-03-44, 4-03-45, 4-03-46, and 4-03-47PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} These consolidated appeals arise from 32 judgments issued on September 11, 2003, by the Common Pleas Court of Defiance County, Ohio, granting summary judgment in favor of the appellees, Powertrain Division of General Motors Corporation (“Powertrain”) 1 and James Conrad, Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“BWC”).
{¶ 2} The facts relevant to these appeals are as follows. Plaintiffs-appellants Jimmie Anders, Pascual Barajas, Glenn Bauer, Harold Becker, Robert Bell, Michael Betts, Richard Bidlack, Henry Brown, Benjamin Carter, Willie Coleman, William…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanley v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-175 (6-5-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Dennis v. Gen. Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Esters v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., Unpublished Decision (9-1-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State ex rel. Boyd v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016