Hill v. HILL SPINNING COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
We need not consider whether it was permissible for defendant to allege as a counterclaim or defense the same facts it had alleged in its said prior action. Suffice it to say, defendant has not alleged such facts.
In a complaint, if plaintiff undertakes to allege two or more separately stated causes of action, each must be complete within itself. It is not permissible to incorporate by reference allegations made in another separately stated cause of action. Heath v. Kirkman, 240 N.C. 303, 82 S.E. 2d 104, and cases cited. A fortiori, it is not permissible for a plaintiff to incorporate by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Francis v. W. J. & J. G. Edwards & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Heath v. KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bullard v. Berry Coal & Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Perry v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Crain & Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Diamond Brand Canvas Products Co. v. ChristySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.