Legal Opinion

Perry v. Owens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1962No. 459PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The complaint herein contains no reference to the prior action instituted by the present defendant against the present plaintiff in the Durham County Civil Court and now pending in said court. Hence, assuming said prior action “is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause,” within the meaning of G.S. 1-127 (3), defendant was required by G.S. 1-133 to assert his plea in abatement by answer. McDowell v. Blythe Brothers Co., 236 N.C. 396, 399, 72 S.E. 2d 860, and cases cited; Buchanan v. Smawley, 246 N.C. 592, 99 S.E. 2d 787; Wallace v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 11, 17, 110 S.E.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Investigation of the Death of MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Diamond Brand Canvas Products Co. v. ChristySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Pendergraft v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Fs Med. Supplies, LLC v. Tannergap, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API