Crain & Denbo, Inc. v. Harris & Harris Construction Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The rules applicable when considering a plea in abatement on the ground that “ (t) here is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause” (G.S. 1-127 (3)) are stated, with full citation of authority, by Ervin, J., in McDowell v. Blythe Brothers Co., 236 N.C. 396, 72 S.E. 2d 860, and by Winbome, J. (now C.J.), in Dwiggins v. Bus Co., 230 N.C. 234, 52 S.E. 2d 892.
The plea in abatement by Harris & Harris is good only if (1) Crain & Denbo could obtain the same relief against Harris & Harris by counterclaim in the Durham action, and (2) a judgment in favor of Harris & Harris…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Burns v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Hamlet Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Williams v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sisk v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965