Bullard v. Berry Coal & Oil Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The sole ground of objection asserted in Franklin’s demurrer is that the Oil Company may not assert herein its alleged cause of action against Franklin but must do so in a separate action.
Ordinarily, in respect of causes of action defined in G.S. 1-137 as permissible counterclaims, a defendant may plead his cause of action as a counterclaim in plaintiff’s action or institute a separate action thereon. But where the issues raised in the plaintiff’s action, if answered in his favor, will necessarily establish facts sufficient to defeat the defendant’s cause of action, the defendant must assert…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Montgomery v. . BladesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bullock v. CrouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Manning v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Williams v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Brazell Bros. Contractors v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Sisk v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.