Morris v. Morris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The courts approach with apprehension and misgivings the task of -construing wills — of saying what one now deceased meant by the words he used during his lifetime in the disposition of his property to take effect at his death. Holograph wills especially are like the men who make them- — individual. Two wills of exactly the same wording may be differently construed by reason of the different circumstances surrounding the testator at the time he made the will — • differences in the number and ages of relatives, the amount and character of his property, his legal and moral obligations, and,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Clark v. ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Pittman v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Asheville v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.