Legal Opinion

Board of Transportation v. Pelletier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 773SC1072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants Lewis agree that the land in dispute is embraced within the metes and bounds description contained in Pelletier’s Registered Land Certificate. They bottom their claim, however, on the fact that the disputed land is not included in “Tract No. 2 of the division in 'Jelser, et al. vs. Newby, et al.,' Special Proceeding No. 415.” Defendants Lewis realize that their claim must fail if the disputed land was in fact intended to be covered by the description in the land certificate.

In construing a deed description it is the function of the court to determine the true intent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Sugg v. . GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Midgett v. . TwifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Lee v. McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Franklin v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Pardue v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Inland Harbor Homeowners Ass'n v. St. Josephs Marina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Pardue v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API