Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. City of Kinston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

TLe question presented at tbe tliresliold of the case is whether the protestants are entitled to prosecute the appeal from the order of the Utilities Commission to the Superior Court. The protestants rely upon Utilities Com. v. Coach Co., 216 N. C., 325, 4 S. E. (2d), 897; S. c., 218 N. C., 233, 10 S. E. (2d), 824, for an affirmative answer. The Railroad Company cites Corp. Com. v. R. R., 170 N. C., 560, 87 S. E., 785, as authority for a negative reply.

It is provided by C. S., 1097, that “From all decisions or determinations made by the Utilities Commissioner any party affected thereby shall…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corporation Commission v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Wade v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Parker v. Raleigh Savings BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Utilities Com. v. . Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Parrish v. BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API