Christian v. Birch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceMinge, Judge
I join the majority opinion except for part I, that classifies the choice of what state’s general statute of limitations applies to a claim as a procedural matter and automatically applies the statute of the forum state. I would apply the choice-influencing-consideration analysis which is used to resolve conflicts of substantive law to determine the applicable statute of limitations. Because applying those choice-influencing considerations would produce the same result reached by the majority, I concur.
A. Classification of Statute-of-Limitations Questions
As the majority notes,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Danielson v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Entzion v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004