State v. Andy
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶ 1 In Washington, criminal defendants have the right to a public trial. Const, art. I, § 22. Courtrooms may be closed only in certain limited circumstances. Today, we evaluate whether a potential obstacle to public access constituted a courtroom closure. The potential obstacle in this case was a sign that listed the courthouse hours. *297Defendant Joey Andy argues that because the sign listed a specific closing time and his criminal trial proceedings continued after the listed closing time, the sign constituted a courtroom closure. However, the evidence shows that at all times during Andy’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State of Washington v. Jose Jesus MancillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Anne Kari Brewitt v. Islam Gamal El Din Michael Abdel GhaniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington v. Adam J. PersellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.