Legal Opinion

State v. Andy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2014No. 90567-3PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶ 1 In Washington, criminal defendants have the right to a public trial. Const, art. I, § 22. Courtrooms may be closed only in certain limited circumstances. Today, we evaluate whether a potential obstacle to public access constituted a courtroom closure. The potential obstacle in this case was a sign that listed the courthouse hours. *297Defendant Joey Andy argues that because the sign listed a specific closing time and his criminal trial proceedings continued after the listed closing time, the sign constituted a courtroom closure. However, the evidence shows that at all times during Andy’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Jose Jesus MancillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Anne Kari Brewitt v. Islam Gamal El Din Michael Abdel GhaniCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington v. Adam J. PersellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API