Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Jose Jesus Mancilla

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 2017No. 31187-2-III; 31188-1-III; 31205-4-III; 31225-9-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPennell, J.

¶1 In the context of a criminal trial, gang evidence is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, such evidence can help jurors understand relationships between defendants and how various symbols and terminology suggest motive and intent. But on the other hand, gang evidence can be problematic. Merely suggesting an accused is a gang member raises the concern he or she will be judged guilty based on negative stereotypes as opposed to actual evidence of wrongdoing. Accordingly, the State’s use of gang evidence requires close judicial scrutiny.

¶2 The State’s gang evidence here largely stands up to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ArredondoWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API