Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Armstrong

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. File No. 8106PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P.J.

At the general election in November, 1936, the plaintiff, R. A. Smiley, and defendant, J. M. Armstrong, were rival candidates, for the office of state’s attorney of Butte county.

The canvassing hoard, having determined that defendant had received a greater number of votes, issued to him a certificate of election. This proceeding was then instituted in the circuit court. Upon a recount of the ballots cast at the election the trial court found that 1,304 votes had been cast for the plaintiff and 1,301 for the defendant, and by judgment the former was declared elected. From this judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Melby v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Vallier v. BrakkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Patterson v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sweetser v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Dakota Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Thorsness v. DaschleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Johnson v. Concrete Materials Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cahalan v. TerrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jewett v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API