Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. Campbell

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1902No. L.A. Nos. 1156, 1202PublishedCited by 61 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James Hutchings, C. C. Haskell, and Hunsaker & Britt, for John L. Campbell, Appellant. C. C. Bennett, and F. W. Burnett, for Intervener, Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The relator and the intervener were candidates for the office of . judge of the superior court in the county of San Bernardino at the general election in November, 1900. Upon canvassing the returns of the election, the board of supervisors declared that each had received the same number of votes, and that there had been no election for the office. The defendant was elected judge of the superior court of that county in 1894 for the term of six years from and after the first Monday of January, 1895, and continued to hold and exercise the office after the expiration of said term. The present…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. People ex rel. Stratton v. OultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. People ex rel. Melony v. WhitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. People Ex Rel. Feeny v. . Bd. of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API