Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Concrete Materials Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1944No. File No. 8708PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The complaint of the plaintiff-employee seeks damages from the defendant-employer for negligence in failing to provide plaintiff with a safe place in which to work. It is alleged that as a result of such negligence plaintiff contracted the occupational disease known as pneumoconiccis or silicosis. The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the theory that it describes an injury by accident for which the Workmen’s Compensation Law, SDC 64, supplies the exclusive remedy. We granted an appeal from the trial court’s order overruling the motion.

The question presented is whether the complaint…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Foble v. KnefelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McNeely v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Brink v. DannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Campbell v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. TEGEKS v. Western Chevrolet Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Cooper v. VinatieriSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Concrete Materials Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API