Legal Opinion

Thorsness v. Daschle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1979No. 12645 to 12652, 12657, 12658, 12660, 12663 and 12679PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

This Court has previously decided that it is empowered to conduct a post-election review of the Thorsness-Daschle election to the United States Congress. See Thorsness v. Daschle, 279 N.W.2d 166 (S.D.1979). The review has now been completed. We determine that Daschle won.

Subsequent to our initial decision herein, this Court held a conference with counsel for the parties to narrow the issues presented by this proceeding. Pursuant to that conference, this Court by independent order required counsel to examine all disputed ballots and segregate them into categories in such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bandy v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Nist v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Application of KohlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Corbly v. City of ColtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smiley v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Duffy v. MortensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McIntyre v. WickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re the Grievance of Troopers AikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stellner v. WoodsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API