Knight v. City of Wilmington
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The questions presented by this appeal concern the adequacy of the City’s plans for extending fire and police protection into the annexed area, the establishment of a new boundary line, and the constitutionality of G.S. 160A-56. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the New Hanover Superior Court.
Under G.S. 160A-50(f), a party challenging an annexation action of a governing body must show (1) that the statutory procedure was not followed, or (2) that the provisions of G.S. 160A-47 were not met, or (3) that the provisions of G.S. 160A-48 were not met. In re…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnhardt v. City of KannapolisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Briggs v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Ridgefield Properties, L.L.C. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.