Barnhardt v. City of Kannapolis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend on appeal that the trial court erred in granting judgment in favor of defendant because (1) defendant was obligated but failed to provide plaintiffs with reasonable, timely notice that they had the right to require the extension of water and sewer lines to their involuntarily annexed properties, and because (2) defendant failed to install water mains and sewer trunks in substantial conformity with representations made on annexation maps prepared to comply with G.S. § 160A-47(l)(b). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Judicial review of an annexation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- RPR & Associates, Inc. v. University of North Carolina-Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Salvaggio v. New Breed Transfer Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Goodson v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- H.B.S. Contractors, Inc. v. Cumberland County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- City of Durham v. WooCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.