Legal Opinion

Briggs v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 2003No. COA02-1296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

From the judicial review of an annexation ordinance, the residents of the proposed annexation area contend the superior court erred in holding that the City of Asheville (“Asheville”) substantially complied with the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-47 and -48 (2001) in its annexation of the Long Shoals Area near Asheville. We hold on appeal that the superior court: (I) properly allowed Asheville to amend the annexation record at the time of judicial review; (II) erred by classifying a condominium common area as commercial; and, (III) erred by failing to find Asheville’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Huyck Corp. v. Town of Wake ForestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. ADAMS-MILLIS CORPORATION v. Town of KernersvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Barnhardt v. City of KannapolisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Norwood v. VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Arnold v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. U.S. Cold Storage v. City of LumbertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API