Legal Opinion
Wagstaff v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 30, 2014No. 11-466CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*173Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(B) (Notice of Appeal); Motion For Relief From a Final Order; Pro Se; RCFC 59 (New Trial, Reconsideration, Altering or Amending a Judgment); RCFC 60 (Relief From A Judgment or Order).
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT OR ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.
On July 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Compl.”), alleging four claims for relief. Compl. ¶¶ 146-69. Count I alleged that the Department of Education, through “oppression and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- James M. Patton and Joann Patton, Legal Guardians for Thomas Edward Patton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hicks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Asg Solutions Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Clarke Health Care Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Hvf West, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.