Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Lampert
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 2007No. CC 02-05-201M; CA A124795; SC S53154PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALMERJ.
The issue in this case is whether petitioner’s convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm must be set aside because the predicate conviction on which his status as a felon was based was overturned three years after the felon-in-possession convictions. The trial court set aside the felon-in-possession convictions, but the Court of Appeals reversed. Bailey v. Lampert, 203 Or App 45, 125 P3d 771 (2005). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
In 1995, a trial court convicted petitioner of felony sexual penetration in the first degree, ORS…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- State v. RainoldiOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PartainOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. StarkOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Farmer v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.