State v. Rainoldi
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
ORS 166.270(1) provides that any person “who has been convicted of a felony” who owns or possesses a firearm commits the crime of felon in possession of a firearm. The issue in this case is whether the statute requires proof that the defendant knew that he had been convicted of a felony before he possessed, or attempted to possess, a firearm. The Court of Appeals held that ORS 166.270(1) requires proof of such knowledge and that the trial court erred in failing to deliver a jury instruction to that effect. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the circuit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Travon GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. OwenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SimonovOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ProphetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.