Legal Opinion

State v. Rainoldi

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2011No. CC 061255770; CA A136377; SC S058846PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

ORS 166.270(1) provides that any person “who has been convicted of a felony” who owns or possesses a firearm commits the crime of felon in possession of a firearm. The issue in this case is whether the statute requires proof that the defendant knew that he had been convicted of a felony before he possessed, or attempted to possess, a firearm. The Court of Appeals held that ORS 166.270(1) requires proof of such knowledge and that the trial court erred in failing to deliver a jury instruction to that effect. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the judgment of the circuit…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Travon GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. OwenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. SimonovOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Ogle v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. ProphetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API