Legal Opinion

State v. Barklind

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 1975No. 2863-1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

The defendant, David Barklind, pleaded guilty to the crime of second-degree burglary. Judgment of conviction was entered, imposition of sentence was de ferred for 1 year, and he was granted probation. The sole question presented on appeal is whether Barklind, an indigent, was denied his constitutional right to legal counsel without cost, because one of the conditions of his probation required him to pay Island County $150 as reimbursement for a portion of the expense of his court-appointed attorney.

The agreed facts are these: Following his arrest on suspicion of burglary, Barklind submitted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Woodhouse v. DoreWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Brundage v. EideWashington Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LenihanMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. State v. BarklindWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. LivingstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. OparaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API