Pinto Technology Ventures, L.P. v. Sheldon
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman
Subject to public-policy constraints, forum-selection clauses are generally enforceable in Texas.1 Though enforceability is not the concern it once was,2 courts are frequently confronted with disagreements about the specific claims encompassed and the extent to which nonsignatories may resist or enforce such clauses. In determining these matters, common principles of contract and agency law3 and the parties’ chosen language are the fulcrum of our inquiry because forum-selection clauses are creatures of contract and we must give effect
to the parties’ intent as expressed in the four corners of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Henry v. Cash Biz, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- HMT Tank Service LLC and HMT LLC D/B/A and F/K/A HMT, Inc. v. American Tank & Vessel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Fairfield Industries, Inc. v. EP Energy E&P Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Finley Res., Inc. v. Ep Energy E&P Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.