Groom v. State, Department of Transportation
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 1999 the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board concluded that Scott Groom had injured himself in a slip-and-fall incident at work. In 2003 the board reversed course and determined that Groom had not been involved in a slip-and-fall incident. After finding that Groom's work duties required neither heavy lifting nor episodes of prolonged standing and that Groom had not been required to engage in heavy or extended snow shoveling, the board denied Groom's claims for various disability and impairment benefits. We reverse the board's 2008 reso-Tution of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Luper v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Beverly J. Sumpter v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Ge Vue v. Walmart Associates, INC., and New Hampshire Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020