Legal Opinion
Cocks v. Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1928No. 5503PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The appellants seek the reversal of a decree of the court below which dismissed their complaint in a suit wherein they charged the appellees with infringement of claims. 6 and 7 of letters patent No. 1,170,478, issued February 1, 1916, to Edgar Coeks for a door bed. The invention was described as particularly pertaining to the mounting of a door bed, and its objects were declared to be two: First, to provide a mounting for a folding bed, whereby the latter can be swung from one side to the other of a door opening independent of the door, and be positioned parallel to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- F. Wesel Mfg. Co. v. Printing Machinery Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
- Kestner Evaporator Co. v. American Evaporator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Thompson v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Dernell Potato Products Co. v. SnellingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.