Legal Opinion

Dernell Potato Products Co. v. Snelling

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 17, 1930No. 201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This patent No. 1,199,124, granted Sepr tember 26, 1916, for a new and useful improvement in food products, was held valid and infringed below. It consists of a process ■of frying or cooking food products, especially potato chips, in grease or fat, and then entirely removing the absorbable grease or fat from the cooked products. This removal is accomplished, according to the teachings of the patent, by the use of ether, alcohol, butane, pentane, and petroleum ether. After the ■chips are cooked, they are soaked or washed irt one of these solutions until all the grease is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Snow v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. Miller Rubber Co. v. BehrendCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  5. National Malleable Castings Co. v. Buckeye, Malleable Iron & Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Hartford Empire Co. v. Obear Nester Glass Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1931
  3. Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1939
  4. Standard Computing Scale Co. v. Lincoln Scale Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Radio Corp. of America v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API