Legal Opinion

F. Wesel Mfg. Co. v. Printing Machinery Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1914No. 11-42PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the E. Wesel Manufacturing Company against the Printing Machinery Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

Complainant is the owner of Letters Patent No. 673,485, May 7, 1901, to Edward R. Storm. It says the defendant has infringed the first and third of the 15 claims thereof. The patent is for an improvement in printing plate holders. The patentee sometimes employs the same word to describe different things. It will be well, therefore, to define the sense in which certain terms will be here used.

The printing plate itself will be called the '“plate.” The block, bed, or base upon which it must be secured while printing is being done will be referred to as the “base.” The device…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Cocks v. Rip Van Winkle Wall Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API