Neumann v. Moretti
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion in the present case, and in the case between the same parties, ante, p. 25.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to secure the cancellation of a certain note and mortgage executed by plaintiff Paul Neumann to defendant. The facts are fully stated in the appeal from an order denying a new trial this day decided (S. F. No. 3960, ante. p. 25.)
After the complaint was filed and summons issued, before answer or appearance by defendant, the court, on the ex parte application of plaintiff, granted a restraining order, commanding the defendant, his agents and servants, until further order of the court, to absolutely refrain from assigning or transferring or disposing of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- San Diego Water Co. v. Pac. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- McCracken v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Alaska Improvement Co. v. HirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Schmidt v. BitzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- ABBA Rubber Co. v. SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Laam v. McLarenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Maier v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Yellen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.