Legal Opinion

Alaska Improvement Co. v. Hirsch

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1897No. S. F. No. 372PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

Action upon an injunction bond. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

An action was brought against plaintiff in the United States circuit court to enjoin it from using a certain trademark and label. October 23, 1890, a temporary restraining order was made, pending an order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not he issued. Both orders were served on that day. On the next day, counsel for the defendant in the injunction suit, plaintiff here, “moved the court for an order requiring complainant to give a bond, in the sum of ten thousand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Carter v. MulreinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Neumann v. MorettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Snow v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hickman-Coleman Co. v. LeggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Tutty v. RyanWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API