Legal Opinion

Maier v. Luce

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1923No. Civ. No. 4157PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

In this matter petitioners seek to prohibit the superior court of the state of California, in and for the county of San Diego, and E. A. Luce, as judge thereof, from proceeding with the punishment of one of the petitioners under an order to show cause why he should not be punished for a contempt of said court.

In a suit pending in said court an injunction was sought enjoining and restraining defendants, who are the petitioners herein, from operating under the name of “San Diego Cab Company, ’ ’ as well as from using in their business taxicabs known as “yellow cabs.” On the filing of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hicks v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Winslow v. NaysonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Ex parte GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. In Re BrambiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Greenly v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Shelton v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API