Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Bitzer

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1903No. S. F. No. 3160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. Suit by H. F. H. Schmidt against Albert Bitzer and another. From an order refusing to dissolve an injunction, defendant Bitzer appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This appeal is from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction. As the injunction was granted upon a verified complaint, it may be conceded that the court, in its discretion, could have refused to dissolve the injunction, provided the complaint states facts sufficient to show that the restraining order should have been granted in the first instance. The complaint sets forth a written contract, by the terms of which the plaintiff and defendants, after reciting that they were engaged in the butcher’s business in the city of San Francisco, mutually agreed “not to handle trading…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neumann v. MorettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Guardian Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Guardian Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API