Legal Opinion

Grady v. Easley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1941No. Civ. 12477PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment made August 2, 1939, against appellants Easley under section 437c of the Code of Civil Procedure for the sum of $2416.33 and costs, it being contended (1) that the affidavits of respondents filed in connection with their motion for summary judgment are insufficient to support such judgment; (2) that appellants’ affidavit filed in opposition to said motion is sufficient to entitle them to defend or present a triable issue of fact, and that the entry of the summary judgment improperly deprived them of their constitutional right to a jury trial.

Section…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Oil Well Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Albermont Petroleum, Ltd. v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. De Echeguren v. De EchegurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. City of Garden GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API