Legal Opinion
Home Builders Ass'n of Dayton & the Miami Valley v. City of Lebanon
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 2006No. Nos. CA2005-01-002 and CA2005-01-005PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Powell, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant and cross-appellee, the city of Lebanon, appeals the decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas finding unconstitutional the city’s ordinance requiring that all newly constructed commercial and residential units be connected to the city’s broadband telecommunications system. We affirm the common pleas court’s decision.
{¶ 2} In 1997, the city of Lebanon decided to develop a broadband telecommunications system. The city contracted with a private company to construct the system, which included a hybrid fiber coaxial (“HFC”) network, a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Teamsters Local Union No. 436 v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Hyde Park Circle, L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State ex rel. Phillips Supply Co. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ohioans for Concealed Carry v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Zimmer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.