Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. General Shaver Corp.

THOMAS, District Judge.,

This matter is now before the Court on defendants’ application to show cause “why further testimony should not be taken herein and the parties further heard”.

The facts which led up to the signing of the rule are set forth at length in the plaintiffs’ return to the order. They may be briefly summarized and are as follows:

1. The last brief was received by the court on or about April 14, 1938, and the case was under consideration by the court when, on November 16, 1938, a letter was received by the court and signed by Mr. Tulin which is set forth in full as Exhibit 1 in…