Legal Opinion

Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1940No. 9178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

'L'his is an appeal under § 129 of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 227a, from a decree rendered in a suit in equity for the infringement of letters patent, the decree being final except for the ordering of an accounting.

The suit was brought by appellees, Schick Dry Shaver, Incorporated, Schick Industries, Limited, and Edises, Incorporated, against appellant, Motoshaver, Incorporated, and a codefendant, Dalmo Manufacturing Company (hereafter called Dalmo). The patents involved are Nos. 1,721,530, 1,747,031 and 1,757,978, issued to Jacob Schick on July 23,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Motoshaver, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc. v. Wotoshaver, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. Kugelman v. SketchleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Davis v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Davis v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Davis v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API