Legal Opinion

Poniktera v. Seiler

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 2010No. D054267PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

—In this action, Linda Poniktera alleged Deborah Seiler, acting in her official capacity as Registrar of Voters for the County of San Diego (Registrar), violated statutory and constitutional provisions by (1) having a written policy that improperly limited the ability of citizens to document election voting with cameras and other recording devices, and (2) not enacting or enforcing policies to secure election ballot boxes against tampering or to require poll workers to account for ballots. Poniktera’s action sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as a writ of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Munro v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Minnesota Majority v. Joe ManskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. PG Publishing Co. v. AicheleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Vanderkous v. ConleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Diaz v. Sohnen EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Diaz v. Sohnen Enters., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API