Legal Opinion · Dissent

Diaz v. Sohnen Enters.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 10, 2019No. B283077Published

1Dissent

SEGAL, J., Dissenting.

*133I agree an employee can impliedly accept an arbitration agreement by continuing to work for his or her employer. I also think an employee, like any other contracting party, can reject an arbitration agreement offered by an employer and yet continue to work for the employer. Whether an employer and an employee entered into an implied agreement regarding the terms of employment is a factual issue we routinely ask a trier of fact to decide in employment cases. Because the facts in this case do not support only one reasonable conclusion, I would defer to the trial court's…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API