Legal Opinion

Vanderkous v. Conley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 2010No. A125352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

Richard Vanderkous, as trustee of the Richard Vanderkous Trust, sued Nanette Ujdur Conley seeking to quiet his title to certain real property. In its statement of decision the court found that, while Vanderkous had legal title to the property, Conley retained an equitable interest. Title was thus quieted in Vanderkous, and Conley was directed to execute a quitclaim deed in his favor. But Vanderkous, in return, was directed to pay Conley the full market value of the property as compensation for her equitable interest. Following issuance of the statement of decision,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. S. B. Beach Properties v. BertiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mesa Shopping Center-East v. O HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Bank of America v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. 510pacificave v. Lucido CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Ridec LLC v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Ridec LLC v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API