Legal Opinion
Minnesota Majority v. Joe Mansky
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2013No. 11-2125PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Several groups interested in electoral and governmental reform sued the Secretary of State, and Ramsey and Hennepin county election officials (“Minnesota”). Minnesota moved for dismissal, which the district court granted. The groups appeal as to the claims under the First Amendment and the Equal Protection clause.1 Jurisdiction being proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms in part, reverses in part, and remands.
*1055I.
Election Integrity Watch (“EIW”) is comprised of Minnesota Majority, Minnesota Voters Alliance, and the North Star Tea Party Patriots. These groups…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Jon Couzens, Jr. v. William DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Larry Ball v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Scott T. Richardson v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Brittany Tovar v. Essentia HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.