Gainesville Midland Railroad v. Tyner
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is no merit in the contention that the court erred in overruling the general demurrer. The allegations of the petition were sufficient not only to show a trespass, but a continuing one, on the plaintiffs’ land, and this being true the case comes within the rule that equity will, by injunction, repress a continuous trespass. Wall v. Mercer, 119 Ga. 346 (46 S. E. 420); Martin v. Pattillo, 126 Ga. 436 (65 S. E. 240); Loudermilk v. Martin, 130 Ga. 525 (61 S. E. 122); Moore v. Daugherty, 146 Ga. 176 (91 S. E. 14); Durrence v. Groover, 160…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Horton v. MurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Deaton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Price v. GrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Smith v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Jackson v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Duffee v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.