Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Becker

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1961No. 38,096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

This is an action to recover damages for conversion of a truck. Defendant, the Wild Rice Motor Company, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

On August 25, 1958, the plaintiff and one Albert Becker entered into an agreement wherein plaintiff transferred to Becker the former’s 1950 International truck. At that time the following instrument, received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 4, was signed by Becker:

“August 25, 1958

Sold to Albert Becker

For: $1700

Bought From Harold Hughes

Harold to receive 60% of Truck wages until truck is paid for.

Albert Becker”

Accordi…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. HandlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Downer v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  5. Gilbertson v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bergstedt, Wahlberg, Berquist Associates, Inc. v. RothchildSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Transport Leasing Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Miller v. Colortyme, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. McEwen v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Jansen v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API