Legal Opinion

Moar v. Beaudry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1963No. 36172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff (appellant) initiated this action to recover the unpaid balance due under a conditional sales contract of a sawmill. The defendants (respondents) defended and counterclaimed upon grounds of breach of express warranty. Plaintiff replied, relying upon waiver and the statute of limitations. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim and defendants’ counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals.

The undisputed facts reveal that: In February, 1955, the parties orally negotiated the sale and purchase of the sawmill in question; snow then prevented inspection…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Carter v. Curlew Creamery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stouffer-Bowman, Inc. v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heasley v. Riblet Tramway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Robertson v. BindelWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Jensen v. LedgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Altman v. SigurdsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Charles and Bambi Compton v. Lewis Clark Saddle ClubCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API