Legal Opinion
Heasley v. Riblet Tramway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1966No. 38040PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Langenbach, J. †
This is an action to recover straight time wages for overtime work. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
The facts are not seriously in dispute. In the summer of 1959, the appellant initiated work under a contract with His Majesty’s Government of Nepal (hereinafter referred to as HMG) to erect a steel-wire ropeway or aerial tramway. This contract was financed through the United States Agency for International Development (hereinafter referred to as AID). It had offices in Katmandu, the capital of Nepal, and in Washington, D. C. The appellant was to install the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Music v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Stouffer-Bowman, Inc. v. WebberWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Hardung v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Colonial Imports, Inc. v. Carlton Northwest, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- McLean v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Jackson v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Gordon Sandvik v. Alaska Packers Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.