Legal Opinion

Strand v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1943No. 28828PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

— This suit was brought for the purpose of quieting title to tidelands located near the mouth of the north fork of the Skagit river. Plaintiffs, in their complaint, alleged title in the property, described as follows:

“All tide lands of the second class to the line of extreme low tide lying in front of Lots 5 and 6, Section 7, Township 33 North, Range 3 E.W.M., with a frontage of 61.40 lineal chains, more or less, measured along the Government meander line; also tide lands of the second class to the line of mean low tide measured along the Government meander line commencing at the North west…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. United States v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. O'Neill v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API