Legal Opinion

Altman v. Sigurdson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1963No. 36569PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action to replevy a number of household articles, or for damages in the sum of $500. Typical of the articles claimed were dishes, glassware, cutlery, ceramic pieces, sugar and creamer sets, Christmas tree ornaments and bric-a-brac. Plaintiff testified that she had rented her home in Bellingham to the defendants at a reduced rental on condition she be allowed to store the articles in the attic. She said that, in many visits to the house, she had seen these things in use by the defendants. She testified that later she noticed many of her things in a vacant house formerly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dakin v. DakinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hallin v. BodeWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kaufman v. KaufmanWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Moar v. BeaudryWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edinger v. EdingerWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API