Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1996No. S-7347PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents the sole question of whether a genuine issue of material fact precludes summary judgment on the scope of the duty assumed by the State of Alaska (State). The superior court concluded that the State owed the decedent Dominic Smith no duty and granted summary judgment in favor of the State. We reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

Most of the facts underlying this appeal are not in dispute. A May 1992 fluoride poisoning incident in Hooper Bay resulted in widespread illness and the death of Dominic Smith. The cause of this poisoning was ultimately traced to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Broderick v. King's Way Assembly of God ChurchAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Kotzebue v. McLeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dayhoff v. Temsco Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Saddler v. Alaska Marine Lines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Mulvihill v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Arctic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Raleigh, Schwarz & PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. P.G. v. State, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API