Legal Opinion

Liebman v. City & County of San Francisco

United States Circuit Court

Decided August 24, 1885PublishedCited by 13 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Field, Justice.

This is an action against the city and county of San Francisco to compel the payment of 20 coupons for interest, each amounting to $30, attached to certain instruments designated in tho pleadings as “Montgomery Avenue Bonds.” The plaintiff prays for judgment; that the coupons are valid obligations of the city and county; that there is due by it, upon each of them, the sum of $30, with interest from the date of its maturity at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum; that the city and county pay the amount thus adjudged due from the special tax to be annually levied, assessed, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Pana v. BowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Mulligan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. School District v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Union Trust Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Johnson v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mather v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  5. Todtenhausen v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API