Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Morrill
California Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1942No. S. F. 16733; S. F. 16734; S. F. 16735; S. F. 16736PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The petitioners, Johnson, Cohen, Allen and Zulim, separately seek the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, Morrill, as County Clerk of the County of Solano, to accept for filing and registration the affidavits of their .qualifications as electors residing in that county. The matters are submitted on the petitions, the answers thereto, and a stipulation of the facts.
The petitioners are employed in national defense activities at Mare Island Navy Yard near the city of Vallejo, Solano County, and reside on various defense housing projects constructed outside the confines of the Navy Yard…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Silas Mason Co. v. Tax Commission of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. City of ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Coso Energy Developers v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Arledge v. MabryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Arapajolu v. McMenaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- State ex rel. Parker v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.