Legal Opinion

Todtenhausen v. Knox County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox Count), Will D. Weight, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buchanan

This cause, for good and sufficient reasons to the court appearing, has been advanced and heard at our 1915 Jackson term, under the provisions of our statutes.

On May 1, 1915, August Todtenhausen, on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers of Knox county, filed *172Ms original bill in tMs canse, seeking to restrain tbe sale of certain bonds issued by tbe county of Knox, under tbe authority of an act of tbe general assembly approved March 19,1915, and being chapter 117, Senate Bill 386, Private Acts 59, general assembly of the State of Tennessee.

The above act is entitled:

“An act to authorize Knox…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Myar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Turner v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Quinn v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Riggins v. TylerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API